Skip to main content

How do you put that life vest on anyway?

In Dr. Robert Bjork’s video, How We Learn Versus How We Think We Learn, he used the example of the pre-flight safety briefing flight attendants give when he discussed testing as pedagogy rather than assessment. I paused the video after this example because I wanted to see if I could also remember how to put the life vest on if needed in an emergency. Coincidentally, I went out of town this past weekend and tried this during the safety briefing. I tried to remember the steps before the flight attendant to see how much I could remember. The steps came to me easily from memorization from the several times I have traveled in my lifetime, but then I thought to myself, could I or would I actually remember these steps if I had to perform them? With the added layer of possible panic, what would this look like? How do I know I can even put the vest on correctly, if I have never actually done it before? If an emergency arises, how effective would this briefing be, no matter how many times we have seen it?

This example reminds me of the testing rule that Rhodes, Cleary, and DeLosh (2020) introduce in chapter 9 that states “testing will usually be most effective when the learner produces information rather than recognizing the information” (p. 181). The studies of this rule prove that when students have to produce answers to tests, or attempt free recall, it “leads to bigger learning benefits than practicing recognition tests” (pp. 182-183).

Knowing this and going back to the example of the pre-flight safety briefings, Bjork nonchalantly throws out the idea of having practice stations in airports to give passengers that opportunity to practice what we see and hear in the pre-flight safety briefings. If we are given the chance to practice and then produce what we’ve learned, how much more effective and how much more prepared would we be? I know personally, I’d feel a lot more comfortable if I ever needed to put my life vest on. The idea of needing to put one on is scary, but the act of doing it would be one less thing to worry about during an emergency. 

This also reminds me of the Fire Drill episode of The Office when Dwight planned a fire drill for the office to test their memory of the fire drill steps, but I digress. 


Applying this rule to how I learn has been interesting. To start, applying this rule has been fairly recent for me. As recent as this course, which is an issue already. Why am I learning about testing and recall and retrieval practices as a PhD student and not during my time in the PK12 system. I can only imagine the type of student I would be now. However, practicing this rule now for class and completing the RPAs has changed the way I learn, remember, forget, and retrieve. It is still new to me, and at times I resort back to my usual ways of learning, procrastination and cramming, but as continue to practice, it will become my new way of durable and long-lasting learning and remembering. 

Rhodes, M. G., Cleary, A. M., & DeLosh, E. L. (2020) A guide to effective studying and learning: Practical strategies from the science of learning. Oxford University Press.

University of California Television. (2016 February 17). How we learn versus how we think we learn [Video]. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oxZzoVp5jmI

Comments

  1. I am rushing off to watch that Office episode now! Thanks for contributing to the HI-OD blog.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Let’s throw Learning Styles AND Multiple Intelligences out the window!

Logical-mathematical, musical, analytical, practical, tactile, olfactory, poetic, faith-based, monochromatic—everyone has their own best way of learning and we should cater to each individual’s fundamental learning needs. Maybe some people learn best when surrounded by abstractions in navy, turquoise and yellow. They should all carry this artwork around with them everywhere.  Right? Nonsense! Learning styles and multiple intelligences are related concepts and stem from related literatures. Some of these concepts that have emerged are reasonable, while others are not.  Reasonable:   Gardner’s fundamental argument that people can access learning through multiple avenues—for example, through reading a book, watching a video, and practicing in the field—and learners should engage a variety of avenues in order to optimize learning.   Unreasonable:   The way in which the idea of learning styles has taken root in our collective psyche is not so reasonable. Individuals ...

Learning is an experience. Everything else is just information.

A quote from Albert Einstein.     A quote that spoke to me as I believe it summarized well the concept of Illusions of Comprehension presented by Dr. Robert Bjork.     Illusions of comprehension is the idea that we confuse performance with learning.     Performance is described as that which we can observe – learning as that which we must infer.     I looked up the word infer to make sure I had the exact definition.     To infer is to deduce or conclude from evidence and reasoning.     It is that step beyond memorization where you actually apply the knowledge gained.     What do our intuitions tell us about learning?     Messages we get going through school tell us that learning means doing well on that test or getting a good grade.     I got an ‘A’!     I must have learned the content!     The structure of school contributes to this sense that learning happens and is assessed w...

To grade, or not to grade, that is the learning question.

         “I know grades don’t matter in grad school, but it’s so validating to get a 4.0!” I sent this message to a few friends at the end of FA20. I was happy to know I received a 4.0 GPA after taking 2 PhD classes while working full time (something I hadn’t done in 2 years). If I believe “grades don’t matter in grad school,” why did I get so excited about this assessment of my performance? Why did I finally get A+ grades? I have been in school for over 20 years now…Am I smarter this many years later? Or am I studying better? Is it both? Robert Bjork would probably tell me it is both. On one hand, I am “performing better” because I have deeper foundational knowledge and am able to successfully generate connections/engage processes (Brown et.al., 2014, p.76). On the other hand, graduate school forced me to do my readings before the lecture. As it turns out, learning is optimal for ESL students if they read the content before a lecture (Uni...