Skip to main content

Self Advocating and Persevearance are the New Learning-Styles

  

"File:Active Learning (27461) - The Noun Project.svg" by Innovation Co-Lab Duke Innovation Co-Lab is marked with CC0 1.0

Math did not come easy to me throughout most of my K-12 life. There were many nights spent at my kitchen table, tears rolling down my face as my parents would try their best to help me break down word problems. Numbers would be pulled out of thin air by me, leading my parents to return to the mantra of “you cannot just make things up!” and then the yelling from me would continue. Word problems would take me hours to solve until the day my parents figured out I needed math to be more visual. Afterwards, all my word problems included stick figures, diagrams with arrows and numbers, and lots of boxy looking cars going x miles per hour from point A to point B. Although my parents knew I needed the visual learning, they never once told me I was only a visual learner, nor did they tell me I had to tell my teachers (the experts in their eyes) that visualization was the only way I could learn. Using pictures was my way of better understanding the material and one of many skills I could utilize to help me learn better, but it was never the only way. The concept of learning styles as a child was never over emphasized but instead “tried on” and placed in my toolbox of possible skills to use when the learning was difficult. In this way, I am lucky that my parents never bought into labels as a crutch for why I was struggling, and instead used learning styles as a way to overcome difficulties but never the only way.

Now, fast forward to me as an English/Language Arts teacher helping students fill their own toolboxes with various ways of learning for each content area, which occasionally utilizes the learning styles of kinesthetic, visual, tactile, and auditory. Unfortunately, early in my career I did utilize the quizzes and made informed decisions about how my students learn best while allowing them to label themselves as these kinds of learners. However, what I quickly discovered in my primarily English Language Learner classrooms, was that all students benefit from all learning styles, especially when learning how to read, write, speak, and listen. All students benefit from hearing how a word sounds, using the new vocabulary in a sentence, drawing pictures to represent the meaning of the word, and even acting how their interpretations of how the word is represented. All students benefit from listening to other students share answers, writing their own answers, visually drawing concepts from stories, and sharing their own learnings with the class. Learning styles should not be taught in silos, but built upon like Legos.

The most difficult students I have taught have been the ones who use their learning styles or educational labels (Gifted and Talented, 504 Plans, IEPs, etc) as badges of honor and crutches, instead of something that helps or hinders their learning. Obviously, I am more than accommodating for students who have these very necessary accommodations, but as a teacher my job is to help students achieve success by learning the skills that help them overcome their adversities so they can be successful adults, workers/employees, and/or college students. I appreciated the analysis of how learning-styles have been so popular by the authors Pashler, McDaniel, Rohrer, and Bjork, specifically regarding responsibility. They state, “If a person or a person’s child is not succeeding or excelling in school, it may be more comfortable for the person to think that the educational system, not the person or the child himself or herself is responsible” (p.108). I have encountered students who have approached me and said they cannot take notes or give a speech because it does not align with their learning-style. Students do not learn these words on their own! I know there are no Instagram, Tik-Tok, or Snapchat accounts they follow that reinforce learning styles like “Yo! You a visual learner bruh so you can’t speak in front of a crowd! You gotta go H.A.M with the drawings!” (Please know I just combined a ton of slang that may or may not be popular at the moment… I try to keep up but Urban Dictionary only allows me to be so up to date and most of it makes me blush when I look it up). Somewhere in their education, a teacher/parent/adult told them they could only learn and be successful one way, and honestly, that is really sad. That adult limited the student’s ability to see struggle and learn how they best can overcome it to be successful. Instead, that student now thinks they can only learn one way and often that one way is not a one-size-fits-all for every challenge. 

I believe advocating for individual needs is an extremely valuable skill for students, but not when it closes them completely off to a new way of being successful. The label does not always help students but hinders their ability to learn. My best students who have IEPs or specific educational labels have been the ones who advocate for their needs while asking for help on how to become better learners applying a wide variety of skills and tools to their repertoire. They want to succeed and refuse to limit themselves to one style. This to me is way more important to teach our students than what learning-style or personality they are; teach them how to advocate and apply skills so they experience their own success to struggles. Struggling is the core of learning; it is our jobs to help students see their full potential in those moments not pigeon-hole them.

Comments

  1. "Struggling is the core of learning" is such a powerful statement...I wonder how we can help everyone to understand that those desirable difficulties are important to the learning process?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Let’s throw Learning Styles AND Multiple Intelligences out the window!

Logical-mathematical, musical, analytical, practical, tactile, olfactory, poetic, faith-based, monochromatic—everyone has their own best way of learning and we should cater to each individual’s fundamental learning needs. Maybe some people learn best when surrounded by abstractions in navy, turquoise and yellow. They should all carry this artwork around with them everywhere.  Right? Nonsense! Learning styles and multiple intelligences are related concepts and stem from related literatures. Some of these concepts that have emerged are reasonable, while others are not.  Reasonable:   Gardner’s fundamental argument that people can access learning through multiple avenues—for example, through reading a book, watching a video, and practicing in the field—and learners should engage a variety of avenues in order to optimize learning.   Unreasonable:   The way in which the idea of learning styles has taken root in our collective psyche is not so reasonable. Individuals ...

Learning is an experience. Everything else is just information.

A quote from Albert Einstein.     A quote that spoke to me as I believe it summarized well the concept of Illusions of Comprehension presented by Dr. Robert Bjork.     Illusions of comprehension is the idea that we confuse performance with learning.     Performance is described as that which we can observe – learning as that which we must infer.     I looked up the word infer to make sure I had the exact definition.     To infer is to deduce or conclude from evidence and reasoning.     It is that step beyond memorization where you actually apply the knowledge gained.     What do our intuitions tell us about learning?     Messages we get going through school tell us that learning means doing well on that test or getting a good grade.     I got an ‘A’!     I must have learned the content!     The structure of school contributes to this sense that learning happens and is assessed w...

To grade, or not to grade, that is the learning question.

         “I know grades don’t matter in grad school, but it’s so validating to get a 4.0!” I sent this message to a few friends at the end of FA20. I was happy to know I received a 4.0 GPA after taking 2 PhD classes while working full time (something I hadn’t done in 2 years). If I believe “grades don’t matter in grad school,” why did I get so excited about this assessment of my performance? Why did I finally get A+ grades? I have been in school for over 20 years now…Am I smarter this many years later? Or am I studying better? Is it both? Robert Bjork would probably tell me it is both. On one hand, I am “performing better” because I have deeper foundational knowledge and am able to successfully generate connections/engage processes (Brown et.al., 2014, p.76). On the other hand, graduate school forced me to do my readings before the lecture. As it turns out, learning is optimal for ESL students if they read the content before a lecture (Uni...