Skip to main content

Getting through Medical School



 Dear Jacob,


As you start your first year of medical school, I am writing you this letter to offer you some words of wisdom on effective study strategies and debunk some widely accepted, yet wrong, theories. In my courses this year, I have been learning about the best ways for students to encode information, learn for longevity, and do well on exams. As I am studying to become a professor, I have found some of the things that I have learned along the way surprising. Did you know that the reputable method of identifying your learning style and catering content to be presented in that particular style for best results is actually not based on any kind of empirical research? 


It’s important to remember that set-backs and frustration are signs of improvement and effort. When learning is effortful, it is more successful. It helps to think of these moments of chagrin not as failures, but as desirable difficulties because without them, there is no advancement in learning. 


The most important study strategies you can employ are retrieving new learning from memory, spacing out your practice, and interleaving different problems and subjects. I will attempt to put these strategies in the context of medical school. 


Retrieving New Learning from Memory: When you learn a new anatomical structure, engage in self-quizzing at the end of each chapter. Focus on the weak areas that you tend to get wrong instead of continuously engaging in the areas you are familiar with. It’s not really helpful for your learning to underline and highlight text, because re-reading really just ensures familiarity with the text, not the content. You might find that re-reading feels more comfortable, and that self-quizzing can be frustrating when the content is hard to recall. Try to remember that when the going gets tough, that’s when the learning is strengthened and the memory longevity is improved. 


Spacing out Practice: 


You should allow time to pass between your study sessions. Imagine you are studying for a pharmacology exam. Make some flashcards with each medication and it’s applications and contents on the back and shuffle through the cards until you master them. Do not remove the ones you recall from the deck, you want to keep going over all of the content, even if you feel comfortable with it, because in this way, your memory will be strengthened. The key is to keep periodically recovering the content you went over. Between practice sessions, take a nap or go for a run. Give yourself some time between each session. Another way you can space out your practice is to go back and forth between studying subjects. For example, study pharmacology content and then switch over to biochemistry. Following the ideology of “practice, practice, practice” is actually not useful. This rote repetition study strategy encourages short term memory use, and quickly fades. 


Interleaving Practice Problems and Subjects: 


Interleaving is another important study strategy. What it means is that you should interleave the types of problems and examples that you are learning. Mixing in other subjects, problem types, and skills is important to challenge yourself and encourage long term memory. When studying anatomy, don’t focus on one body part for an extended time period, try to switch it up and throw in some biology specimens or chemistry problems. You can also interleave in one subject area. For example, in Biochemistry, switch from studying the chemical components of the human body and their functions to the molecular architecture of organelles. 

 

One last word of advice, Jacob. The more you can “elaborate” on content, more cues will be available for your recall and application of the material. Elaboration is the process of finding layers of meaning that resonate with you. For example, you can relate the material to words you already know through mnemonic device use. Personal comparisons and metaphors are your friends in medical school. 


Take heart, my brother, 


Kate 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Let’s throw Learning Styles AND Multiple Intelligences out the window!

Logical-mathematical, musical, analytical, practical, tactile, olfactory, poetic, faith-based, monochromatic—everyone has their own best way of learning and we should cater to each individual’s fundamental learning needs. Maybe some people learn best when surrounded by abstractions in navy, turquoise and yellow. They should all carry this artwork around with them everywhere.  Right? Nonsense! Learning styles and multiple intelligences are related concepts and stem from related literatures. Some of these concepts that have emerged are reasonable, while others are not.  Reasonable:   Gardner’s fundamental argument that people can access learning through multiple avenues—for example, through reading a book, watching a video, and practicing in the field—and learners should engage a variety of avenues in order to optimize learning.   Unreasonable:   The way in which the idea of learning styles has taken root in our collective psyche is not so reasonable. Individuals ...

Learning is an experience. Everything else is just information.

A quote from Albert Einstein.     A quote that spoke to me as I believe it summarized well the concept of Illusions of Comprehension presented by Dr. Robert Bjork.     Illusions of comprehension is the idea that we confuse performance with learning.     Performance is described as that which we can observe – learning as that which we must infer.     I looked up the word infer to make sure I had the exact definition.     To infer is to deduce or conclude from evidence and reasoning.     It is that step beyond memorization where you actually apply the knowledge gained.     What do our intuitions tell us about learning?     Messages we get going through school tell us that learning means doing well on that test or getting a good grade.     I got an ‘A’!     I must have learned the content!     The structure of school contributes to this sense that learning happens and is assessed w...

To grade, or not to grade, that is the learning question.

         “I know grades don’t matter in grad school, but it’s so validating to get a 4.0!” I sent this message to a few friends at the end of FA20. I was happy to know I received a 4.0 GPA after taking 2 PhD classes while working full time (something I hadn’t done in 2 years). If I believe “grades don’t matter in grad school,” why did I get so excited about this assessment of my performance? Why did I finally get A+ grades? I have been in school for over 20 years now…Am I smarter this many years later? Or am I studying better? Is it both? Robert Bjork would probably tell me it is both. On one hand, I am “performing better” because I have deeper foundational knowledge and am able to successfully generate connections/engage processes (Brown et.al., 2014, p.76). On the other hand, graduate school forced me to do my readings before the lecture. As it turns out, learning is optimal for ESL students if they read the content before a lecture (Uni...