Skip to main content

Here We Are

Dear Ross,

Here we are. Thirty-one years into this life. A teacher and a professional learner--or so I thought. What have you been reading all this time? Who have you been listening to? And how did you manage to get this far without knowing what the empirical truth was behind the importance of spaced retrieval. Sure, you practiced critical reflection or monitoring behavior implicitly, and you even spent a good part of your study time elaborating on concepts, as is often required in English classes. But you also crammed and regurgitated answers to questions long forgotten, and you did so quite often. No wonder school was a nightmare for you in your early years. You were basically stumbling through school with a greased up brain--information sliding right out! 

I have some information for you. And if you want to retain it, you are going to have to listen to me, you...us. 

Through specific steps in structuring how we study, we can begin to arrest the constant forgetting that plagues our mind. We just have to follow a few  One that does not demand you spend sleepless nights reading and rereading textbook chapters with the hopes of one day retaining enough information to feel comfortable sitting in front of a blank test. Now we can spend weeks interleaving and mixing practice, testing and retesting yourself, discussing ideas with friends, and then, like the first ski run down the mountain of the season, you have to just trust that you know what you are doing. The information is up there to carry you down. 




What you have to do is organize yourself enough, and to stick to a schedule long enough, for this new information to be useful. Create structure in your life that facilitates these processes around what you wish to learn, and remember that learning is effortful. It takes effort to find and retrieve information, and that effort translates into stronger mental connections and a more fruitful long-term learning experience.

Also, teach this stuff! 

Holy moly, let the people know. Teach your students what it means to elaborate on an idea, what the reasons for that elaboration are, like building a more complicated and nuanced understanding of a topic. Help students understand that is is not the information going in that matters, but what can be produced or retrieved. 

And finally, as is stated in Make it Stick, 'be transparent' as a teacher, and reinforce learning behavior that is proven to be useful--none of this learning styles and intelligences stuff (sorry Gardner). Build fun low-stakes testing into the curriculum at spaced intervals and let your students know why. Weave these ideas into your curriculum. Encourage and help students find the right spacing and search for meaning in ideas being discussed, to make connections to prior material and life experience.


Sincerely,


Ross

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Let’s throw Learning Styles AND Multiple Intelligences out the window!

Logical-mathematical, musical, analytical, practical, tactile, olfactory, poetic, faith-based, monochromatic—everyone has their own best way of learning and we should cater to each individual’s fundamental learning needs. Maybe some people learn best when surrounded by abstractions in navy, turquoise and yellow. They should all carry this artwork around with them everywhere.  Right? Nonsense! Learning styles and multiple intelligences are related concepts and stem from related literatures. Some of these concepts that have emerged are reasonable, while others are not.  Reasonable:   Gardner’s fundamental argument that people can access learning through multiple avenues—for example, through reading a book, watching a video, and practicing in the field—and learners should engage a variety of avenues in order to optimize learning.   Unreasonable:   The way in which the idea of learning styles has taken root in our collective psyche is not so reasonable. Individuals ...

Learning is an experience. Everything else is just information.

A quote from Albert Einstein.     A quote that spoke to me as I believe it summarized well the concept of Illusions of Comprehension presented by Dr. Robert Bjork.     Illusions of comprehension is the idea that we confuse performance with learning.     Performance is described as that which we can observe – learning as that which we must infer.     I looked up the word infer to make sure I had the exact definition.     To infer is to deduce or conclude from evidence and reasoning.     It is that step beyond memorization where you actually apply the knowledge gained.     What do our intuitions tell us about learning?     Messages we get going through school tell us that learning means doing well on that test or getting a good grade.     I got an ‘A’!     I must have learned the content!     The structure of school contributes to this sense that learning happens and is assessed w...

To grade, or not to grade, that is the learning question.

         “I know grades don’t matter in grad school, but it’s so validating to get a 4.0!” I sent this message to a few friends at the end of FA20. I was happy to know I received a 4.0 GPA after taking 2 PhD classes while working full time (something I hadn’t done in 2 years). If I believe “grades don’t matter in grad school,” why did I get so excited about this assessment of my performance? Why did I finally get A+ grades? I have been in school for over 20 years now…Am I smarter this many years later? Or am I studying better? Is it both? Robert Bjork would probably tell me it is both. On one hand, I am “performing better” because I have deeper foundational knowledge and am able to successfully generate connections/engage processes (Brown et.al., 2014, p.76). On the other hand, graduate school forced me to do my readings before the lecture. As it turns out, learning is optimal for ESL students if they read the content before a lecture (Uni...